-
Academic writing 8pm Ipshita
Posted by Ipshita on June 17, 2021 at 8:29 PMYou should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005, 2010 and 2015 about McGill University.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Unknown Member replied 3 years, 6 months ago 7 Members · 8 Replies -
8 Replies
-
Unknown Member
Deleted UserJune 17, 2021 at 9:14 PMThe table illustrates the percentage results of good results being given by students of McGill University during surveys in 2005, 2010 & 2015 for different aspects like teaching quality, Library resources, Student Services, range of Modules offered and Sports & Social facilities.
As per the table, for student service aspect the ratings showed a continues increase over the period. Starting from 54% in 2005 it showed a significant increase to 81% in 2010 & continued to increase upto 95% by end of 2015. On the contrary, the Percentage decreased continuously over the period. Starting from 39% in 2005, it reduced to 31% in 2010 & continued to decline to 25% by 2015
-
Unknown Member
Deleted UserJune 17, 2021 at 9:29 PMPlease do not consider this
-
-
Unknown Member
Deleted UserJune 17, 2021 at 9:25 PMThe table illustrates the percentage results of good results being given by students of McGill University during surveys in 2005, 2010 & 2015 for different aspects like teaching quality, Library resources, Student Services, range of Modules offered and Sports & Social facilities.
As per the table, for student service aspect the ratings showed a continuous increase over the period. Starting from 54% in 2005 it showed a significant increase to 81% in 2010 & continued to increase upto 95% by end of 2015. On the contrary, the Percentage decreased continuously over the period. Starting from 39% in 2005, it reduced to 31% in 2010 & continued to decline to 25% by 2015
Whereas for the Teaching Quality, Library Resources the Percentage increased by a very minor value over the period. For Teaching Quality it decreased from 74% in 2005 5o 72% in 2010 & again increased to 78% in 2015. SImilarly for Library Resources the Percentage has increased from 86% in 2005 to 88% in 2010 & reported a little reduction to 87% in 2015. The Sports & Social Facility have reported no change in Good rating as 65% over the period.
So based on the above survey it can be concluded that Students of McGill University were happier with the University offering on Teaching Quality, Library Resources & Student Services over the period but the Range of Modules over were not meeting the expectation.
-
Unknown Member
Deleted UserJune 17, 2021 at 9:31 PMThe table illustrates the results of surveys conducted on different aspects such as teaching quality, library resources, student services, range of modules offered & sports & social facilities in 2005,2010 & 2015 about McGill University.
Overall; the teaching quality, library resources & student services ratings improved significantly over the years(2005,2010 & 2015) in McGill University. While, there was a rapid decline in the ratings for range of modules offered. Furthermore, sports & social facilities ratings remained constant throughout the period.
In 2005,students gave the highest rating to library resources, as 86% of the students termed it as the best rated aspect in McGill University. However, the range of modules offered received the lowest rating as only 39% of students voted for it. Furthermore, teaching quality, sports & social facilities & student services received the moderate ratings of 74%,65% & 54% respectively.
In 2010,library resources received the highest rating, as 88% of the students termed its services as the best. Whereas, range of modules offered got the lowest rating as only 31% of the students rated it. Moreover, teaching quality, sports & social facilities & student services received the moderate ratings of 72%,65% & 81% respectively. Ratings of student services improved remarkably from 54% -81% from 2005 to 2010.
In 2015,student services received the highest rating, as 95% of the students termed its services as the best. Whereas, range of modules offered got the worst rating as only 31% of the students rated its services effective. Moreover, teaching quality, sports & social facilities & library resources received the moderate ratings of 78%,65% & 87% respectively.
-
Unknown Member
Deleted UserJune 17, 2021 at 9:33 PMThe table illustrates the surveys recorded about McGill University in the year 2005, 2010 and 2015 respectively.
The ratings for the student services kept outperforming the previous recorded year constantly standing at 78 in 2015, While the range of modules offered couldn’t keep up it saw a decline in ratings which fell from 39 in 2005 to 25 in 2015.
Though the ratings for Teaching quality came down to 72 in 2010 it bounced back and recorded 78 in 2015. As the library resources is trying to keep up the pace it still witnessed a minute downfall in 2015 and of all the aspects Sports and social facilities remains unchanged in all the 3 years sticking to 65 good ratings.
In Conclusion, For three years the ratings for Range of modules offered kept sinking, Student services has plunged and sports and social facilities remained unchanged.
-
Unknown Member
Deleted UserJune 17, 2021 at 9:40 PMThe tabular data contemplates the variations in academic choices, made by students at McGill University over the tenure.
Overall,it is manifest from data that student services have superseded amongst the remaining fields as growth of students is more pronounced over initial five years ,escalating massively from 54% to 81%,followed by marginal increase in 2010 till 2015 by 14% respectively.Moreover, teaching quality holds moderate statistical change, since 10 years with 8%, ranging from 74% to 78% whereas in the period of 2010,saw the decline in the number of pupils in the same.
It is evidently seen that numerous fluctuations have be noticed in library resources with a rise of 2% from 86%to 88%.Many good ratings have been given by University students mainly in two fields namely: in university sports field and social facilities .
To conclude, every individuals have rated into various domains according to interest level.Aspect like range of modules got a poor rating by pupils as it’s value noticed a falling in the figure over the initial and last years.
-
Unknown Member
Deleted UserJune 18, 2021 at 10:16 AMThe table below emphasises on the surveys conducted in 2005, 2010 and 2015 regarding various services and aspects offered by McGill University.
In 2005, while students rated the library resources with 86% being the highest among all other services, range of modules offered by the university was rated 39% being the least to be rated in that year.Furthermore, in 2010 and 2015, it’s percentages diminished to 31% and 25% respectively.However ratings received for library resources remained fairly constant at 87% and 88% in 2015 and 2010 respectively.
Teaching quality dipped to 72% in 2010 when compared to 74% rated in 2005 but it gained a momentum and the rating increased to 78%.Sports and social facilities service did not show any improvement with numbers remaining constant at 65% during all the periods the survey was conducted.Nevertheless, the student services witnessed a drastic increase from 54% in 2005 to a steep jump to 80% in 2010 which further rose to 95% in 2015.
It can be observed from the statistics that sports and social facilities need to be ramped up and immediate brainstorming sessions need to be held to contemplate on improving the different modules offered by the university to attract more students in the future.
-
Unknown Member
Deleted UserJune 21, 2021 at 7:56 PMThe table illustrates about the good qualities based on ratings of McGill University like Teaching quality, Library resources, student services, variety of modules offered, sports and social facilities which varies between 2005, 2010 and 2015.
As per the table, only student services was the only aspect of the University which showed a continuous improvement in its rating over a decade from 54% in 2005 to 95% in 2015. However, there was an opposite trend in range of modules being offered aspect in University which went down from 39% in 2005 to 31% in 2010 and then decreased with the difference of 6% in 2015.
Whereas, both teaching quality and library resources aspects showed a fluctuation percentage-wise during the year 2005, 2010 and 2015 with the minimal effect. At first, in 2005, it decreased with minor change of 2% then it went upward from 72% to 78% between 2010 and 2015. Similarly, the second aspect in the table rise up from 2005 to 2010(i.e. 86% and 88% respectively) and dropped down with just 1% in 2015. Moreover, the last aspect of this table which hasn’t changed in its rating i.e Sports and social facilities. The only aspect which had a constant performance with no changes at the percentage of 65% over the decade.
Log in to reply.