[NIL Admin]

Sample for reference:

Undoubtedly governments of developed nations should share the responsibility of helping less fortunate nations. Different measures exist, ranging from market access to direct financial payments or even medical assistance. This essay will explain why certain measures are inherently better than other methods.
Firstly, the most adequate manner to assist the lesser developed countries is not through health or education ‘hand-outs’. This method is flawed and only offers temporary relief from long-term challenges; also this assistance can be cut at any moment, leaving the country stranded. For example, economical help from the UK to disadvantaged regions in Africa has gradually been reduced since the onset of the financial crisis. Although some parts of the continent may be better educated or in better health, the benefit was short lived, thus leaving the countries of Africa to look for other donors.
Commerce is without doubt the most essential type of assistance that can be given. If the lesser developed country has the opportunity to develop trade, then it will build strong capabilities to serve it for the long term. These strengths can develop the local economy and are more reliable than education or health. For example, while trading with the richer country the government can search for other foreign markets to trade with. This would offer more stability and diversification for the nation.
To conclude, assistance is definitely necessary for the poorer regions; however, ‘hand-outs’ are short-term solutions. The optimum solution is to offer market access so the region can produce products and generate regular income.

[Unknown Member]

Good Health care system, Basic Education and employment are basic needs of each human being unfortunately developing countries unable to provide the same to their citizens. Some scholars thinks that it is entire responsibility of developed countries whereas others not agreeing on this.

In this essay will try to discuss roles of rich countries for bridging this gap and responsibilities of poorer nations for sustaining this development which they have achieved with support of developed countries.

All people are born equal, and everyone should have same rights and opportunities regardless of the nationality. The people around the globe should have access to basic educations, paid employment and efficient health care system but sometimes it is very difficult for developed countries to provide the same due to number of reasons such as population, frail economy & lack of opportunities. In this case, advanced countries should essential aid such as financial & practical, to countries that are desperate for economic relief. For example, G7 countries should provide required medicine, vaccinations, foods to the developing countries in the event of pandemic or during any natural calamities.

Indeed, its moral responsibility of advanced nations for helping underdeveloped countries so that their citizens will get equal opportunities from similar to the residents of wealthier countries.

Despite of all kind support received from developed countries, mainly financial help to these nations but still they are not utilizing that help wisely as normally it gets accumulated with political leaders and their relatives. For example, as per WHO data, millions of vaccinations and funds released to our country to support during COVID-19 but on ground number of people still waiting for that assistance.

In my opinion, the most effective solution is to provide financial and economic support to developed countries so that citizens from these countries will receive fundamental needs & this is impossible without support from developed countries.

[Unknown Member]

Developed nations should lend a helping hand to indigent nations .Some people believe that the former should support the later so as to improve the overall condition of the poorer nations.This essay will argue why developing nations should support the the underpriviledged countries.

It is expected of affluent countries to help third world countries but it is completely unfair to the taxpayers ,to use their hard earned money for upgrading the health and education system of other countries when they themselves are lagging behind .Moreover ,it is ethically wrong to expect funding from another country because it means Devoiding the citizen of their basic rights . Every developed country does not have enough funds for their own population so how can we expect them to pay for other countries .For example although America is one of the richest countries still American citizens do not have the access to the free medical healthcare ,thus they have to have to buy their personal insurance .In conclusion Rich nations are not morally bound to fund poor nations.

On the contrary the help provided by priviledged countries could make a great deal of difference ,furthermore it would mean better infrastructure and more job opportunities .As well as it would also play crucial role in eradicating diseases from world,prevent world war three and decrease rate of illiteracy .For instance, Ebola would have not spread if not for adequate funding .Thus,to conclude help from rich nations would be beneficial in all aspects.

This essay argued that well off nations should support less fortunate nations ,in my opinion it is essential that the former help the latter as this would be of great significance and world will become a better place to live