-
Task 2 ( discuss both the views) : economic progress
Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Write at least 250 words
-
11 Replies
-
For many lands, Authorities claim that economic progress is the most crucial way for having wealth in countries while some claim that there are various sections that are equally vital. Personally, although they are equally important, a priority investment plan should be considered in different ways following the country’s level of development.
On the one hand, Economic growth should be prioritized in undeveloped nations before developing in other progress in order to generate a bunch of income, which allow authorities to fulfil the population’s primary needs such as food, security and accommodations. In addition, the government could utilise this money on developing facilities’ life and bring prosperity to their region. For instance, individuals in some poor countries, which firstly improved their economy, gained better welfare compared with somewhere the government invested in other sections.
On the other hand, Although economic growth is vital, Education’s curriculum and system in both school and university are also important, especially in developed and developing nations since the primary demands are not the most crucial for them anymore. Thus, nations can achieve their purpose easily due to an incline of effectively educated people. For instance, New Zealand, which mostly pays attention to the Education system, has many wise people and incredible innovations.
In conclusion, I personally believe that undeveloped land should be prioritised on Economic growth instead of second needs in order to improve populations’ welfare and fulfil their primary need while Education system should be mostly improved in developed countries.
Thank you madam…
-
@fal ma’am please assess my work
thank you
-
however is not required in the first sentence as comma ((,) and where is serving the purpose
imparative (imperative)
for example (,)
Although is contas
-
-
@fal kindly evaluate my passage.
-
@fal kindly evaluate my passage.
-
-
Nowadays the major topic of discussion in many nations is how to become an independent and strong country. many official authorities believe and also constantly aim to develop their country economically but some section of people believe that It is also crucial to focus on improving other sectors. This essay will discuss both views and justify why I think, It is fundamental to target all the sectors equally than shedding the light on one specific segment.
To start with, There are different reasons for Government officials to trust that improving economically is a priority. Any country which has a good economical foundation could survive in any difficult situation and also can support the public. For example, Russia is a strong and developed country that is fighting against Ukraine without any help from the neighboring countries. In addition to that, when the country is stable economically, It can compete with other nations on the international platform. For example, the UK announced Brexit from the European Union but still operating well in aspects of economics. These are the factors why officials of the country mainly target only an economical upswing.
On the other hand, a certain part of the demographics advocates that other sector needs equal attention as the field of finance for the country. Firstly, people need to have good health and peace of mind to enjoy the economical prosperity of the country, If a country has poor health sectors and is regularly under the threat of war from another country, It will hinder the country’s economic progress. For instance, many European countries were affected badly during the covid-19 pandemic though they all are developed economically. Secondly, people’s education plays a key role in the administrative field of any government because people without education cannot plan and implement any strategies to take their country to next level financially because without education people cannot produce new ideas for the country’s advancement and exhibit their country image in any division. Therefore, It is more important to be liberal than to be stagnant in the idea of boosting the field of the country’s income.
To conclude. It is clearly evident from both points of view that a country cannot be led based on its wealth only but also on other elements like education and health aspects that need to be considered for the welfare of people. I think It is really important for country authorities to decide what areas and issues are needed serious attention than being biased.
Mam, please evaluate my essay.
thank you!
-
Some people argue that majority of governments thinks that their Important role is to economic developments, while other say that all types of developments are equally important for a country.
While development of the country governments should put their efforts to increase the industries setups, increase in the production of agriculture goods and to focus on the export and import of the goods, which will facilitate the economic growth. I believe that boosting the economy will impact on the human life style, human per capita income and country will stand in the good position in the world. For examples, the China has main role to boost their economy and they work hard to develop it and now the country has 20trillion$ economy.
On the one hand, the financial condition of the country plays the vital role in the world level, this will distinct from the other country. There are various aspect to develop the country economy, Here, Government should focus on the increasing the agriculture production, Industrialization and the adapt the new technology which will boost the economy.
On the other hand, all other aspects are also important such as social growth, human development, education system, the human mind will help the people to get innovative ideas, furthermore, good education system will enhance the practical & theoretical knowledge of the people, which will help to develop the country.
In conclusion, although people are thought of the economic growth are more well focused rather than the those who are focusing on all the aspects for the country developments.
-
It has become the general perspective for the governments to keep their prime focus on the economic growth of the country by taking several measures however masses criticize that the other things have been side-lined which should be deemed as important for prospects of the country & citizens. Therefore, in this essay, I am going to discuss in detail about both the key elements in both the aspects and finally state my stand among both the views.
Financial growth is being considered as essential by many administrations for the factors such as sustainable growth required in the economy to keep debt, inflation in controlled rate and needs of cash inflow from foreign investments and companies to spend for countries’ development. Firstly, if the financial growth was considered by government as a mere low value, debt and inflation will transcend beyond its limit, hence it might keep the development of country at bay.
Secondly, focus on financial growth will provide consistent Cashflow that will be required for government’s spending towards infrastructure and basic needs of the people. For instance, during covid time, financially rich countries were able to curb the spread of disease and produced vaccine at larger scale.On the other hand, there are other factors which should be considered as equally important for the country as similar to financial growth. People’s exposure to pollution, green house warming are more concerning now. In addition, safety index should be considered significantly for the citizens to leave in harmony and fraternity. Obviously, people health and environmental protection should be the primary concern irrespective of what wealth the companies like chemical firm and industries generates by paying huge taxes to the governments. Moreover, crime rates in the countries should be in curbed state such as smuggling, murders. Otherwise, this will hamper the growth of the country.
Finally, In my opinion, economic growth and other factors such as pollution, safety index also should be weighed equally for the future aspects and sustainable growth of the country without which progress of the country will get hindered adversely and it leads to menacing danger. So this brings forth the fact all the factors will be the pillars of the sustainable growth of the country otherwise our nation is bound to collapse.
-
@fal kindly evaluate my passage
-
-
People are opinionated while discussing whether the finance-sector or other areas are paramount for a nation. Though certain individuals suggest better monetary stability as more significant, others comment that health as well as the defense aspects should be considered parallel to them. This essay negotiates both these views and will pen down with my thought of uplifting both the economic and other related aspects of each country.
Economic boom of a country seems crucial by many people since this could eventually helps to overcome the line of poverty and to rise the standard of living. In detail, if a country could increase the price of goods and thereby the total GDP, then this amount can be spent on the required demand of food, water, and accommodation for the people. As a result, citizens can accomplish better living standards. For instance, the ruling Indian government had increased their GNP by increasing good’s tax and thus were able to supply food and water for rural people on a larger circle.
Does only economy matters? Some people say no for this question because they have known the necessity of having well-equipped defense team and well-established health care services for a country. In other words, what if the authority failed to protect their own nation even after holding a good share of global economy? Therefore, safety of any country from spies or terrorists and the citizen’s health with better hospital facilities are also of foremost pertinent. The Russian authority, for example, had succeeded in this way by keeping secret security systems including sophisticated war-radars and weapons along with relevant monetary power.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned aspects caused me to think that though people argue differently, should not only the financial status of a country matters but also the safety and health sectors.
-
will pen down with (not required) my thought of uplifting both the economic and other related (crucial) aspects of each country.
need to work on conditional structures
band: 4/6
-
Log in to reply.
